According to Ohio rules, what type of conduct is allowed for impeachment?

Impeachment in the context of evidence law refers to the process of challenging the credibility of a witness. Under Ohio rules, prior inconsistent conduct is permissible for impeachment because it directly addresses a discrepancy between what a witness has previously said and what they are currently stating during testimony. This type of evidence is crucial because it can undermine the reliability of the witness's testimony, showing that they may not be truthful or that their memory may be faulty. By allowing the introduction of prior inconsistent conduct, the court aims to provide a fuller picture of the witness’s credibility, enabling the jury or judge to weigh the trustworthiness of the testimony given.

While character conduct and past criminal conduct can be used for impeachment in certain scenarios, they are more restricted and subject to specific rules and limitations in Ohio. Conduct dissimilar to current testimony would also not specifically address the inconsistencies pertinent to impeachment. Therefore, the choice of prior inconsistent conduct aligns best with the established rules governing impeachment.