How can a prior inconsistent statement be used in court?

A prior inconsistent statement can be utilized in court specifically for the purpose of impeachment, which means challenging the credibility of a witness based on previous statements that contradict their current testimony. This method serves to highlight inconsistencies in the witness's accounts, thereby questioning their reliability and truthfulness.

Additionally, a prior inconsistent statement may also be admissible to prove the truth of the statement made. This is particularly true in cases where the statement qualifies as a hearsay exception, such as a prior statement made under oath or when it was an admission against interest. Thus, the court may allow this statement not only to undermine the witness’s credibility but also to accept the content of the statement as factual evidence.

In contrast, using a prior inconsistent statement merely to reinforce prior testimony, establish character evidence, or argue for a mistrial does not align with the established legal principles surrounding the use of such statements.