How is the contradiction method of impeachment defined?

The contradiction method of impeachment is accurately defined as correcting factual errors made by a witness. This method focuses on pointing out inconsistencies or inaccuracies in the witness's testimony by introducing evidence that refutes their statements. By demonstrating that a witness has testified to something that is factually incorrect, the opposing party can challenge the reliability and credibility of that witness.

This contrasts with other impeachment methods, which serve different purposes; for instance, presenting character witnesses is about attacking the general credibility rather than specific inaccuracies, while highlighting prior convictions or demonstrating personal bias looks more at the witness's character and potential motives rather than conflicting them on specific facts presented during testimony. Thus, the core of the contradiction method is anchored in evidence that directly challenges what the witness has said, making it critical for effectively undermining their credibility based on factual grounds.