In cases where a defendant opens the door to introduce character evidence, what is one potential rebuttal method by the prosecution?

The option that answers the question effectively involves asking character witnesses about specific past acts. When a defendant chooses to introduce character evidence, particularly to bolster their reputation or portray themselves in a favorable light, it can lead the prosecution to challenge this portrayal effectively. By inquiring about specific past acts, the prosecution is able to introduce evidence that could contradict the defendant's claims about their character.

This method allows the prosecution not only to highlight inconsistencies or questionable behavior but also serves to cast doubt on the credibility of the defendant's character witnesses. It operates within the framework of established rules of evidence regarding character, where specific incidents may be admitted to demonstrate a person's character or propensity to act in a certain way. This presents a strategic means for the prosecution to rebut the character evidence presented by the defendant, highlighting a key dynamic in legal proceedings.