Under what circumstances can specific instances of sexual behavior between the victim and the accused be admitted in a case?

The correct option allows for the admission of evidence relating to specific instances of sexual behavior between the victim and the accused, but it needs to be understood within the context of relevant legal standards regarding the admissibility of such evidence.

In many jurisdictions, specific instances of sexual behavior between the victim and the accused can be introduced to illustrate a pertinent issue, such as consent. Evidence of this nature can demonstrate the dynamics of the relationship between the parties involved, which might be relevant to the case. Specifically, if the behavior is directly related to the charges at hand and proves or disproves an element that is in question, it could be admissible.

It's important to note that such evidence is often subject to strict limitations to protect the victim from undue prejudice and humiliation. The rules surrounding its admissibility typically require a judicial examination to determine whether the evidence's probative value outweighs any prejudicial effect.

The other choices reflect common misconceptions or misapplications of evidence law related to sexual behavior in cases of sexual assault or misconduct. For instance, while a defense might attempt to introduce evidence of past behavior to contest intent or credibility, there are specific rules governing this, such as those established under rules like the Rape Shield laws which aim to limit the introduction of