What does a party need to show when introducing a prior statement of identification?

To introduce a prior statement of identification, a party must demonstrate that the statement is consistent with the witness's current testimony. This requirement stems from the necessity to ensure that the identification is reliable and not a product of recent suggestion or manipulation. The statement serves as a way to establish the credibility of the witness's testimony by showing that the identification has remained unchanged over time.

The current testimony's alignment with the earlier identification strengthens the connection between the witness's recollection of events and the evidence presented, reinforcing the reliability of the identification process. This principle is essential in legal contexts, where the integrity of witness testimony can significantly impact the outcome of a case.

In contrast, other options do not align with the standards for introducing prior statements of identification. The need for confidentiality (the first option) does not pertain to identification statements; past convictions (the second option) are relevant for impeaching credibility in a different context; and the presence of the witness at the event (the fourth option) is more pertinent to the ability of the witness to testify rather than the admissibility of a prior identification statement.