What must happen before introducing extrinsic evidence for prior inconsistent statements?

Introducing extrinsic evidence to challenge a witness's prior inconsistent statements requires that the witness must have the opportunity to explain or deny the prior statement. This procedural safeguard is designed to ensure fairness and allows the witness to provide context or clarification regarding the inconsistency. It respects the principle of witness credibility and allows the jury to consider the full perspective before being presented with the extrinsic evidence. By giving the witness a chance to address the inconsistency, you ensure that their testimony is evaluated in a more comprehensive manner.

This requirement is rooted in the broader principles of cross-examination and the right to confront witnesses. It promotes a fair trial by allowing the witness to respond to the claims without immediately undermining their credibility.

The other potential options suggest various procedural steps that might seem relevant but do not directly address the critical requirement of allowing the witness the chance to clarify their previous statement.